by Jessa Cunningham, dramaturg
William Shakespeare based the titular character of his–some might say spookiest– play on an actual figure from Scottish history. However, he took some creative license in his portrayal of the king, changing some facts and traits to make the story more compelling to his audience. Let’s take a look at some of the similarities and differences between Mac Bethad mac Findlaich (the real Macbeth) and Shakespeare’s character:
King Macbeth |
Shakespeare’s Macbeth |
| Becomes king after defeating King Duncan I in battle | Murders to become king |
| Must protect his kingdom from outside attacks | Murders more to protect his throne |
| Well-liked king who promoted Christianity and had peace for many years | Dangerous, impulsive leader |
| Killed in battle by Malcolm III | Killed in battle by Macduff |
| No evidence of witchcraft in his rule | Consulted witches multiple times to secure throne |
As you can see, Shakespeare went for more of a dramatic effect when writing this character, rather than aiming for accuracy. Other than for entertainment purposes, why do you think he did that? What do you learn from his Macbeth that you might not from the real one? When you see the show, what else do you notice about Macbeth? Do you think he mirrors his historical counterpart well, or no?
One Comment
Caleb
I thought it was really interesting that they chose to put on a kids performance of “Macbeth” out of all of Shakespeare’s plays. I enjoyed the fact they incorporated puppets and drums to keep the young audience engaged, and it also probably helped explain the complex themes Shakespeare explored in this story. Something I learned from the article “Macbeth vs. Macbeth” was Shakespeare’s Macbeth is based on a real king who killed a King Duncan to become ruler of Scotland, but that was pretty much the only similarity between them. Shakespeare took a lot of creative liberties to write his play, and I’m glad he did because “Macbeth” is one of my favorites.