Skip to main content
2017-2018 Season

A "Quid Pro Quo"

You may have heard this phrase before (if you've ever listened to Hamilton.) "Quid pro quo" is still commonly used today, though it is a Latin phrase meaning "this for that" and is most common in political circles. Ironically, "Quid" is also a well-known nickname for the pound, and so the phrase has also become a play on words, when used in common speech. What does this have to do with Mill on the Floss? Why, it's money, of course!

Money does not seem to be as big of a deal to us when we look back on history. Someone can say to us "back then, they had to pay $35, which was a small fortune!" And we say, in response, "so what?" But in order to understand the Tullivers' wealth and sacrifices monetarily, and then the subsequent loss of this monetary stature, we should explain a few details of the value of money at that time.  

The pound sterling is the world's oldest currency still in use and has been in continuous use since its inception. The British pound has its origins in continental Europe under the Roman era, as early as 775 AD. Its name derives from the Latin word "poundus" meaning "weight". The £ symbol comes from an ornate L in Libra. The pound sterling was equivalent to 1 pound weight of silver. This was a vast fortune in the 8th century. In 928, Athelstan, one of the first kings of England, adopted sterling as the first national currency. The Bank of England was founded in 1694, followed by the Bank of Scotland a year later. Both began to issue paper money. Silver remained the legal basis for sterling until 1816. The official gold standard was established when Germany adopted it, encouraging mass -international trade for the first time. The idea was that a nation must back its money in circulation with the equivalent in gold reserves. This rendered silver coins as a "token" issue (i.e. not containing their value in precious metal). In 1817, the sovereign was introduced, valued at 20 shillings. The average annual income circa 1800 was less than £20.

In the Victorian era, the common coinage and amounts are as follows (note: each coin is valued by how many units it would take to make a pound. Thereby, a pound is equal to one): Sovereign (Pound): 1         Five pound note: 1⁄5       Two pound note: 1⁄2         Crown: 4      Half-crown: 8     Florin:  10       Shilling: 20         Sixpence: 40          Groat: 60        Threepence: 80          Penny: 240           Halfpenny: 480      Farthing: 960          Half Farthing: 1920               Third Farthing: 2880            Quarter Farthing: 3840 In 1800, £1 would equal approximately around £100 today. Most people never saw a pound: their money came in farthings, halfpennies, pennies, and tokens. British government sources suggest that prices have risen over 61-fold since 1914, so a medieval sterling silver penny might have had purchasing power equivalent to £4.50 today, and a farthing (a quarter penny) would have the value of slightly more than today's pound (about £1.125).

Around 1800 the average weekly wage was around 6-10 shillings and many people earned far less. The British pound experienced an average inflation rate of 2.03% per year between 1800 and 2017. £100 in the year 1800 is worth roughly £7,891 in 2017, a 7791.5% increase in prices. Since the average income in this period (1800-1825) was less than £20 a year, most people went through life without ever coming into contact with banknotes.

In essence, when you hear these monetary phrases tossed around onstage, you should be aware that these are no idle sums. Think about the status that the Tullivers have at the beginning of the play, and how that is changed as the play progresses. How are their daily lives affected when they don't have the money that they once did?

Related Articles

data-content-type="article"

Julius Caesar Dramaturgy Resources

November 10, 2021 09:00 AM
2021-2022 SEASON, JULIUS CAESAR by Shelley Graham, dramaturgy supervisor
overrideBackgroundColorOrImage= overrideTextColor= promoTextAlignment= overrideCardHideSection= overrideCardHideByline= overrideCardHideDescription= overridebuttonBgColor= overrideButtonText= promoTextAlignment=
data-content-type="article"

Elizabethan England

November 09, 2021 01:21 PM
I know I have but the body of a weak and feeble woman, but I have the heart and stomach of a king, and of a king of England too.
overrideBackgroundColorOrImage= overrideTextColor= promoTextAlignment= overrideCardHideSection= overrideCardHideByline= overrideCardHideDescription= overridebuttonBgColor= overrideButtonText= promoTextAlignment=
data-content-type="article"

Historical Time Periods of Julius Caesar

November 08, 2021 12:00 AM
by Emme Corbett, dramaturg As a senior student studying history at BYU. One of the first concepts you learn as a history major is that when you study history, it is vital that you do not bring your modern-day biases with you. As strange as some past behaviors or occurrences may be to our modern eyes, understanding the reality of what life was like in historical societies allows for a more authentic and rich study of the past. It also becomes evident fairly quickly that no matter what point in time you’re studying or where you are in the world, there will be commonalities across many cultures. The shared similarity of the human experience allows these connections to occur, so it is no surprise that researching various time periods could be related back to Caesar in Ancient Rome. It was necessary in our dramaturgical research to explore three major time periods that are encompassed within this play in one way or another. These time periods are first, 49 B.C. Rome, when Julius Caesar first became a dictator of Ancient Rome, and the setting for the original script. Second, 1599 England, when William Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar was first performed, most likely at the Globe Theatre. And third, 1919 Italy, when Italy was recovering from participating in the First World War, and the setting for our performance at BYU. This weakened state created a situation where authoritarianism could ensue. It was an interesting experience to be able to connect the culture of Ancient Rome to that of Italy in the early 20th century. The reason for choosing this production of Julius Caesar to take place in 1919 Italy is not random. The significance of that time period is to draw upon the reality that history repeats itself. An aspect of history that is repeatedly detrimental to countless societies is when a group of people finds itself weak and vulnerable--whether that is due to lack of resources, a change in leadership, exiting a war, or simply evolving generations--and a power vacuum is created. This moment in time when desperation allows for someone to assume leadership (based purely on the need to rely on anybody) and provide temporary relief is often too quickly turned into an authoritarian government. The third time period that we also had to account for in this production was the time of Shakespeare in 1599 England. Some of the questions we had to ask ourselves were: Why Julius Caesar? What elements from the story of Caesar’s assassination did Shakespeare feel would resonate with his audience? From these questions and further research on the Elizabethan period, we discovered that, like in 1919 Italy, there was a concern with the succession to the Crown. Queen Elizabeth I was on the throne at the time and created conflict among the people beyond her just being a woman in power. Queen Elizabeth never married and subsequently never bore any children, thus failing to secure a successor who was in her direct line. Another element of the play that related to Shakespeare’s audience was the role of the plebeians. Their behavior in the play could symbolize how the lower class in the Elizabethan Era, while uneducated and changeable, contribute largely to the success of their society.
overrideBackgroundColorOrImage= overrideTextColor= promoTextAlignment= overrideCardHideSection= overrideCardHideByline= overrideCardHideDescription= overridebuttonBgColor= overrideButtonText= promoTextAlignment=