Skip to main content
2017-2018 Season

A "Quid Pro Quo"

You may have heard this phrase before (if you've ever listened to Hamilton.) "Quid pro quo" is still commonly used today, though it is a Latin phrase meaning "this for that" and is most common in political circles. Ironically, "Quid" is also a well-known nickname for the pound, and so the phrase has also become a play on words, when used in common speech. What does this have to do with Mill on the Floss? Why, it's money, of course!

Money does not seem to be as big of a deal to us when we look back on history. Someone can say to us "back then, they had to pay $35, which was a small fortune!" And we say, in response, "so what?" But in order to understand the Tullivers' wealth and sacrifices monetarily, and then the subsequent loss of this monetary stature, we should explain a few details of the value of money at that time.  

The pound sterling is the world's oldest currency still in use and has been in continuous use since its inception. The British pound has its origins in continental Europe under the Roman era, as early as 775 AD. Its name derives from the Latin word "poundus" meaning "weight". The £ symbol comes from an ornate L in Libra. The pound sterling was equivalent to 1 pound weight of silver. This was a vast fortune in the 8th century. In 928, Athelstan, one of the first kings of England, adopted sterling as the first national currency. The Bank of England was founded in 1694, followed by the Bank of Scotland a year later. Both began to issue paper money. Silver remained the legal basis for sterling until 1816. The official gold standard was established when Germany adopted it, encouraging mass -international trade for the first time. The idea was that a nation must back its money in circulation with the equivalent in gold reserves. This rendered silver coins as a "token" issue (i.e. not containing their value in precious metal). In 1817, the sovereign was introduced, valued at 20 shillings. The average annual income circa 1800 was less than £20.

In the Victorian era, the common coinage and amounts are as follows (note: each coin is valued by how many units it would take to make a pound. Thereby, a pound is equal to one): Sovereign (Pound): 1         Five pound note: 1⁄5       Two pound note: 1⁄2         Crown: 4      Half-crown: 8     Florin:  10       Shilling: 20         Sixpence: 40          Groat: 60        Threepence: 80          Penny: 240           Halfpenny: 480      Farthing: 960          Half Farthing: 1920               Third Farthing: 2880            Quarter Farthing: 3840 In 1800, £1 would equal approximately around £100 today. Most people never saw a pound: their money came in farthings, halfpennies, pennies, and tokens. British government sources suggest that prices have risen over 61-fold since 1914, so a medieval sterling silver penny might have had purchasing power equivalent to £4.50 today, and a farthing (a quarter penny) would have the value of slightly more than today's pound (about £1.125).

Around 1800 the average weekly wage was around 6-10 shillings and many people earned far less. The British pound experienced an average inflation rate of 2.03% per year between 1800 and 2017. £100 in the year 1800 is worth roughly £7,891 in 2017, a 7791.5% increase in prices. Since the average income in this period (1800-1825) was less than £20 a year, most people went through life without ever coming into contact with banknotes.

In essence, when you hear these monetary phrases tossed around onstage, you should be aware that these are no idle sums. Think about the status that the Tullivers have at the beginning of the play, and how that is changed as the play progresses. How are their daily lives affected when they don't have the money that they once did?

Related Articles

data-content-type="article"

Simple is Best

July 26, 2022 12:00 AM
Simple is Best [caption id="" align="aligncenter" width="640"] Indeed.[/caption] by Adam White, dramaturg I write this blog post on the day of final dress rehearsal, on the eve of opening night! Everyone involved in this production of A Man for All Seasons has done marvelous work; the set and costuming and make up are all beautiful, and the cast is eager to put their performance in front of a live audience. I guess one could wonder if a dramaturg would give anything but a glowing report of their play that's about to go up, but quite truthfully: I'm eager for you to see this play! On the subject of wanting you to see our production of A Man For All Seasons, I want to relay to you an interesting experience I had just two day ago. Every BYUarts theatre production gets a promotional video, and I was asked by the video makers in charge of the promotional video to be interviewed for the piece on A Man for All Seasons. I accepted, and when I was in the interview, they had two questions for me: 1.) What is A Man for All Seasons about? 2.) Why should people go see A Man for All Seasons? As a dramaturg, I had a great answer for number one. Summarizing the events of this play in an interesting way was no problem. But that second question? That question gave me the hardest time! In the interview moment I was so flustered by my lack of an a concise answer. I quickly babbled out some gibberish to the camera man, after which I apologized and told him if he needed something more intelligible he shouldn't hesitate to call me back. Needless to say I was pretty embarrassed after the experience. Here's the thing: I'm the dramaturgy for this show. I should have some insight as to why people should go see this play (and I do). As I've thought about this experience and about my work as a dramaturg, I've come to the realize that in this situation what I needed was simplicity. Simple is best. See, during that brief interview with the promotional video guys, I was trying to make up a reason for people to see this show that sounded meaningful, or at least scholarly. That wasn't the right attitude for me at all because it meant that I was reaching beyond the play, maybe for selfish reasons, to lend what I deemed to be credibility to a piece of art that, maybe, doesn't need to be legitimized at all. I was being long-winded and downright silly. What the play really needed was for me to speak its simple 'truth.' To redeem myself a little bit and to put my new motto for dramaturgy into practice, I will tell you why I think people should see A Man for All Seasons. I firmly believe, in the words of Oscar Wilde, that "Life imitates art far more than art imitates Life." This play, this conflict between Thomas More, his family, and King Henry VIII, informs our understanding of what it means to have a conscience. Bolt challenges us to explore what it means to have an integrity and what having integrity means in our most intimate relationships. Also revealed in this play is the corrupting influence of political power. I think that every person grapples with these themes, experiences, and issues.A Man for All Seasons is an important play for people to see. The promotional video guys didn't end up using my interview for the promotional video. Frankly, I feel so relieved; it was awful. May you forego the trappings of intelligent-sounding language the next time you are in an interview. Enjoy the show!
overrideBackgroundColorOrImage= overrideTextColor= promoTextAlignment= overrideCardHideSection= overrideCardHideByline= overrideCardHideDescription= overridebuttonBgColor= overrideButtonText= promoTextAlignment=
data-content-type="article"

Welcome to Zuckerman's Farm!

July 26, 2022 12:00 AM
Come one, come all! Come and see Zuckerman's famous pig! He is quite a sight to see, I do tell you. Please, step right up to get get a better look.
overrideBackgroundColorOrImage= overrideTextColor= promoTextAlignment= overrideCardHideSection= overrideCardHideByline= overrideCardHideDescription= overridebuttonBgColor= overrideButtonText= promoTextAlignment=
data-content-type="article"

Some Pig: Final Thoughts with Wilbur

July 26, 2022 12:00 AM
by Jessa Cunningham, dramaturg After the show wrapped up and people went their separate ways, Garret Rushforth, who played Wilbur, and I chatted and I asked him some questions about his experience with the play. What better way to gain insight about the show than from the actor who was in the thick of things from the very beginning? Here is what Garret had to say about this unique opportunity: Me: How was this experience of playing Wilbur? What was your Favorite aspect of it all? Garret: I loved playing Wilbur. My favorite aspect was discovering the character more and more each performance. I never really felt that I had learned all that the character had to offer. Me: What were some challenges that you faced while preparing for the show? Garret: A few of the challenges that I faced had to do primarily with transportation. My car tried to die a couple of times during the run. As far as developing the show goes, I found that the difficulties were mostly in finding the lines. Not simply reciting them, but discovering what was beneath them, motivating them and making them come to life. Me: What lessons have you learned from playing this part, or just from the play in general? Garret: I've learned that there is an amazing opportunity to find out about yourself from the character discovery process. I also learned how much a family the cast can become if given the opportunity. Me: What is your favorite part of this story? Garret: I love when Wilbur and Charlotte talk about Charlotte's death and Wilbur is so devastated. It showed how deep Wilbur's reliance on Charlotte was as well as his desire to help her too. Me: As you leave this production, what will stay with you? Garret: The friendships I've made and the things that I've learned about myself because of the show. Me: What aspects of your character did you love/latch onto from the beginning? Garret: I latched onto the loneliness aspect of Wilbur's life. For all his life, he'd not been given much of a chance, Fern and Charlotte being the exceptions. He was written off by nearly everyone until Charlotte pointed out how special he is. Me: Any final thoughts you would like to share with those who came to the show? Garret: Charlotte's a web was a show that offered a unique view of friendship and family. It doesn't matter what someone looks like or where they're from, friendship and family can transcend all differences.
overrideBackgroundColorOrImage= overrideTextColor= promoTextAlignment= overrideCardHideSection= overrideCardHideByline= overrideCardHideDescription= overridebuttonBgColor= overrideButtonText= promoTextAlignment=